Why size and risk matter in the approach to online safety


INSIGHT
Published
Mar 25th '24
Share
Facebook

As the regulator for online safety, Ofcom is currently consulting on the codes of practice which set out how online services should meet their new duties from the Online Safety Act to protect people from illegal content.

 

This consultation has three weeks left to run – it ends at 5pm on 23 February – and they’ve had some queries about proposed measures for services in scope.

 

Services of all sizes

Ofcom estimate the new duties cover more than 100,000 services, which range in size.

 

And, when looking at how these services will be regulated, Ofcom consider both the size of a service and the risks of encountering illegal content on a service.

 

So, a one-size-fits-all approach would not be appropriate. Instead, Ofcom codes of practice take a proportionate approach and recommend different measures for different types of services.

 

There is a core of measures which Ofcom recommend for all services. This includes all services having an easy-to-use complaints process and taking appropriate action in response to complaints they receive, as well services having clear, accessible terms and conditions.

 

More stringent measures for larger and riskier services

Given Ofcom commitment to proportionality, they’re proposing that more demanding measures should apply to services that are both large and risky. The benefits of large services adopting measures tend to be greater because more users will be protected by the measure. Also, these services are more likely to be able to implement the most demanding measures.

 

There are different ways of defining ‘large’. Ofcom propose to focus on the number of users, and to define a large service as one which has more than seven million monthly UK users. This is roughly 10% of the UK population. This is like the approach adopted by the EU in the Digital Service Act for the definition of ‘very large online platforms’. An example of a proposed measure that only applies to services that are both large and risky is allowing users to block people.

 

Ofcom also propose some measures for large services even if they have not identified any significant risks. For example, recommending that the boards of all large services should review the service’s risk management activities in relation to illegal harms annually. Any failure in assessing those risks could affect a large number of users, so these risk management processes must be sufficient. The likely complexity of large services means it will be important to review the approach to risk management and make sure risks have been examined properly.

 

Ofcom has also been asked how proposals deal with small services which pose a high risk. They know that small services can sometimes be risky. Bad actors use both large and small services to spread illegal content. For example, terrorists often use small services for more covert activities such as recruitment, planning and fundraising. Grooming occurs on small services as well as large services, and child sexual abuse material is spread on services of all sizes.

 

So, Ofcom draft codes propose significant expectations of services that are small but high risk. For example, there are a series of measures in the codes of practice which are designed to help combat grooming. These apply to any service where there is a high risk of grooming taking place, regardless of its size. Similarly, some smaller services where there is a high risk of child sexual abuse material being shared should use an automated technology called ‘hash-matching’ to detect known examples of such images and remove them.

 

How is ‘risk’ determined?

The level of risk from a service will be established by the service’s individual risk assessment. All services in scope – large and small – are required by the Online Safety Act to undertake a ‘suitable and sufficient’ risk assessment to understand the risk to users.

 

Ofcom recognise that services might understate the risks they pose. To mitigate this, they will produce guidance explaining how services should do their risk assessment, and are seeking views on this guidance as part of the consultation. This includes guidance on the characteristics that would make a service high risk for a particular harm (for example, if users who are children can easily be identified and contacted by strangers this increases the risk of grooming). Ofcom can take enforcement action if a service’s risk assessment is not suitable and sufficient. In addition, they can require a service to take steps to mitigate any risks that they identify when Ofcom review its risk assessment, even if the service itself had not identified these risks itself when it did its assessment.

 

It’s important to remember that this will be the first version of the illegal harms codes. Ofcom expect to build on it over time. This could include recommending measures to a wider range of services, regardless of their size. In the first version of the codes,Ofcom has recommended measures only to large services where they do not yet know whether it is proportionate to extend a measure to smaller services. This can be because of uncertainty on whether a measure is effective enough to reduce harm materially on smaller services, or whether the costs to these businesses or the inconvenience to their users might be disproportionate to the harm the measure can address. As understanding develops, Ofcom might recommend measures for a wider range of services.

 

This is why it’s vital that Ofcom receive all relevant evidence in response to the illegal harms consultation. This will help them to build evidence base to make further iterations of the codes.

 

A reminder that the deadline for the consultation is 5pm on Friday, 23 February.

 

Source:  Office of Communication (Ofcom)

 

About Ofcom

Ofcom is the regulator for the communications services that we use and rely on each day.

 

 

About us

LS Consultancy are experts in Marketing and Compliance, and work with a range of firms to assist with improving their documents, processes and systems to mitigate any risk.

 

We provide a cost-effective and timely bespoke copy advice and copy development services to make sure all your advertising and campaigns are compliant, clear and suitable for their purpose.

 

Our range of innovative solutions can be tailored to suit your unique requirements, no matter whether you’re currently working from home, or are continuing to go into the office. Our services can be deployed individually or combined to form a broader solution to release your energies and focus on your clients.

 

Contact us today for a chat or send us an email to find out how we can support you in meeting your current and future challenges with confidence.

 

Explore our full range today.

 

Need A Regulatory Marketing Compliance Consultant? A Bit More About Us

 

Contact us

 

Why Not Download our FREE Brochures! Click here.

 

Call Us Today on 020 8087 2377 or send us an email.

 

FOLLOW US

Connect with us via social media and drop us a message from there. We’d love to hear from you and discuss how we can help.

 

Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn | X (formally Twitter) | YouTube

 

Contact us