Ads featuring alcohol should not irresponsibly link it with activities or locations in which drinking would be unsafe or unwise. In particular, they must not link alcohol with the use of potentially dangerous machinery or driving and only in exceptional circumstances can an ad feature people drinking alcohol at work. As with other rules in the Alcohol section, this applies whenever alcohol is featured or referred to in an ad, even if it isn’t directly advertising an alcoholic product.
Showing alcohol in locations where its consumption would be illegal or prohibited is very unlikely to be acceptable; for example on the London Underground network, on a train in Scotland in the evening or early morning or inside a football stadium in view of the pitch during a match.
However, creating a clear separation between any alcohol shown and the activities or locations where consumption would be unsafe or unwise, may make an ad more likely to be acceptable.
Driving is perhaps the most obvious example of a situation where drinking would be unsafe and unwise. However, merely featuring a vehicle in an ad for (or which also features) alcohol is unlikely, in itself, to breach the Code. An ad which featured a close-up image of a woman sitting in the passenger seat of a vintage left-hand drive car and who had written an alcohol brand in the condensation on the window, was ruled to be acceptable because the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) noted that no driver was shown and they concluded that there was no link between alcohol and driving (Miller Brands (UK) Ltd, 4 January 2012).
On the other hand, showing images of people who are holding alcoholic drinks as well as car keys is very unlikely to be acceptable (Hi Spirits t/a Antica Sambuca, 9 January 2013). Similarly, an ad which featured a film still showing a character slumped against the outside of a car with one leg inside it, in combination with the text “‘I DON’T WANT TO DIE SOBER’ – Jordan Belfort”, was ruled to link the consumption of alcohol with driving and therefore breach the Code (Koosday Events Ltd, 9 July 2014).
Swimming and water sports have also been considered under this rule and showing or referring to drinking while in charge of a boat is unlikely to be acceptable; as is directly linking the consumption of alcohol with swimming, surfing or other activities conducted on or in bodies of water (The Whitbread Beer Company, 3 November 1999).
A cinema ad which showed people holding beer bottles at a beach party immediately before a scene of them rushing towards the sea and jumping into the waves was partly upheld against because it was considered that viewers were likely to infer that the characters had been drinking alcohol before going swimming at night. However, it’s interesting to note that earlier scenes featuring them riding motorbikes, jumping from a yacht and skinny dipping were ruled to be acceptable as the ASA considered that they were unlikely to be interpreted as directly chronological or linked to the scenes featuring alcohol and that viewers would understand that those activities had occurred at separate times (Wells & Young Brewing Company Ltd, 30 November 2011).
Although showing a beach or swimming pool scene is not necessarily likely to breach the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) Code (especially if the characters are not dressed for swimming and are not shown drinking), caution is advised when featuring that type of location.
Sporting and other physical activities may, generally speaking, be featured provided that there is no particular appeal to under 18s or a link with daring behaviour or aggression (see ‘Alcohol: Challenges bravery and machismo‘). For example, an ad which showed the wounded torso of a bullfighter was ruled against because, by focusing on his scars, the ASA felt that it linked alcohol with a dangerous sport in which the consumption of alcohol would be unwise (Scottish Courage Ltd, 27 July 2005).
Similarly, showing activities like parkour or free running is likely to be viewed as linking alcohol with daring and potentially quite dangerous behaviour, so it seems likely that it could also be viewed as linking alcohol with activities where drinking would be unwise (Cell Drinks, 3 August 2011).
Other activities which marketers should exercise caution when featuring include skiing and horse racing, unless the portrayal is highly fantastical and no consumption of alcohol is shown or implied (Heineken UK Ltd, 11 March 2015).
Less ‘extreme’ or ‘dangerous’ sports (such as golf, football and tennis), seem likely to present much less of an issue under this rule, provided there is clear separation between the sport and the alcohol and no consumption is shown.
- DIY and Machinery
The rule specifically refers to dangerous machinery so linking alcohol with the use of power tools or industrial machinery is, in most cases, unlikely to be acceptable.
However, an ad for an alcoholic drink which featured scenes of two men engaged in DIY using a power drill was judged to be acceptable, due to the clear separation between this scene and the only reference to alcohol in the final scene (Beverage Brands (UK) Ltd, 30 May 2007).
Showing people consuming alcohol at work, or suggesting that they should do so, is very likely to breach the Code.
Although considered under the rules related to unwise styles of drinking, an e-mail for a wine bar promotion which encouraged people to hold their breakfast meetings at the bar and enjoy a glass of wine with their food to make the meeting more interesting was ruled to encourage an irresponsible drinking practice (Corney & Barrow Wine Bars Ltd, 16 March 2011).
Even if people are not actually working, the ASA has upheld complaints against alcohol ads showing people acting irresponsibly and unsafely in an office environment (Beverage Brands, 9 June 2004).
An ad that showed a party on a train station platform was ruled not to breach the Code by showing alcohol consumption in an unsafe location because the ad showed a fantasy event (Bacardi-Martini Ltd, 19 January 2005). However, it seems fair to say that a more realistic depiction is unlikely to be considered acceptable.
Directly linking alcohol consumption to the handling and use of fireworks is very likely to be problematic, while linking it to the viewing of a fireworks show is more likely to be acceptable.
Note: This advice is given by the CAP Executive about non-broadcast advertising. It does not constitute legal advice. It does not bind CAP, CAP advisory panels or the ASA. CAP’s AdviceOnline entries provide guidance on interpreting the UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing.
How can we help!
Our range of innovative solutions can be tailored to suit your unique requirements, no matter whether you’re currently working from home, or are continuing to go into the office. Our services can be deployed individually or combined to form a broader solution to release your energies and focus on your clients.
Why Not Download our FREE Brochures! Click here.
Call Us Today on 020 8087 2377 or send us an email.
You can see our Google reviews here.
We’re looking for guest writers with business know-how and experience to create outstanding articles to feature on our website. Sound like you? Then find out more…